A new survey of carers from across the UK provides a stark assessment of how many of the UK’s seven million unpaid family carers have been plunged even further into financial misery by the cost-of-living crisis.
The research, undertaken by Carers Trust, a UK infrastructure charity for local care organisations, revealed that 41% of all unpaid carers have had to give up paid work altogether to provide the dedicated care at home that a sick or disabled relative needs. A further 23% of respondents reported having reduced the number of paid hours they work because of their caring role.
The research, which was responded to by 2,675 family carers, uncovered the shocking fact that one in seven (14%) unpaid family carers are now using food banks as a result of soaring living costs. In addition:
- 25% have had to cut back on food
- 9% have either sold their home or released home equity to pay for essential items
- 14% have not been able to pay household bills on time
- 39% have had to cut back on other household items
- 29% have had to use a credit card to pay for essential household items.
- 26% have had to borrow money from a friend or a relative
- 18% have had to take out a loan
Carer’s Allowance failing to prevent poverty among unpaid carers
The survey also starkly highlighted the inadequacy of Carer’s Allowance, the principal state benefit for unpaid carers. Currently set at £69.70 per week in England, this is the lowest level benefit of its kind, despite more than one third (34%) of unpaid carers spending 50 hours or more a week caring for a sick or disabled relative.
Eligibility criteria for the benefit are strict: claimants must earn £132 a week or less after tax and must be spending a minimum of 35 hours a week caring for someone.
Over half of all survey respondents said that they do not receive the allowance and, of those who did, 47% of respondents said it was not enough to meet their needs as an unpaid carer.
The survey also found that, instead of preventing poverty among recipients, Carer’s Allowance recipients were more likely to be experiencing financial hardship.
- 59% of respondents receiving Carer’s Allowance said they were struggling to make ends meet, compared to 47% of respondents who don’t receive Carer’s Allowance.
- 20% of respondents receiving Carer’s Allowance said they had had to use a food bank as a result of their caring role, compared to 8% of respondents who don’t receive Carer’s Allowance.
More Government support needed for local carer organisations
A parallel survey of Carer’s Trust’s network of over 120 local carer organisations, who provide services to unpaid carers, has also highlighted the impact of recruitment challenges and funding shortages on their ability to support unpaid family carers.
48% of services cited fundraising and sustainability as the principal challenge to work supporting unpaid carers, whilst 40% of respondents cited staff recruitment and retention as a challenge – almost twice the level (23%) reported the year before.
Responding to the findings of the survey, Carers Trust’s CEO Kirsty McHugh said: “Our nation’s health and social care system relies on the hard work of millions of unpaid family carers. However, the double whammy of lack of financial support and struggling local services means that millions of unpaid family carers are being pushed into dire poverty.
“With little ability to work, unpaid carers simply cannot boost their earnings to meet the cost-of-living crisis. Yet they need to keep the heating on and equipment running to keep their sick and disabled relatives warm and safe.
“The recent Autumn Statement simply did not recognise the extra cost of being an unpaid carer. We therefore need to raise Carer’s Allowance urgently and to add it to the list of benefits qualifying for the additional £900 cost-of-living support payment.
“We also need Government to make good on its long awaited promise to publish a proper strategy for unpaid carers. As a country we’re relying on unpaid carers to keep the health and care system afloat. The least we can do in return is ensure they get a fair deal in return.”