close

Leaders give mixed reaction to extra £1.5bn for social care

Consumers Feel The Pinch With Christmas Around The Corner

The government’s social care plans have been met with a mixed reception following yesterday’s Spending Round announcement by Chancellor Sajid Javid.

Javid pledged that £1.5 billion would be provided for local councils in a bid to help “stabilise the system”, including a 2% council tax precept used to raise £5 million.

Professor Martin Green OBE, chief executive of Care England, said: “If the Chancellor had neglected social care in his Comprehensive Spending Review it would have morphed into an incomprehensive spending review as it is essential to set the books straight for social care.

Story continues below
Advertisement

“This money is extremely welcome, but it must reach the front line.”

Care England has also said it will seek to work with the Treasury to ensure that it is delivered to front line care services.

Martin continued: “In an integrated health and social care system which the Government aspires to it is right that social care is allocated a greater share of the joint resources.

“Our latest research demonstrates that some 30 councils are paying providers less than £500 per week for residential care.  Such dismally low fee levels barely allow many providers to fulfill their minimum statutory obligations, let alone invest the necessary resources to ensure the longer-term stability of their organisations.

“Thus, our representations to the Treasury made clear that low levels of funding are one key component of why many providers are currently being forced to close their services”.

Julie Ogley, the president of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS), said it was a “positive first step” that local authorities and care providers at least had clarity for the next year.

“It is not as much as we and others have set out is needed, and we will want to understand the detail including how this fits with other funding for local government and the NHS.

Meanwhile, Sally Warren, director of policy at The King’s Fund charity, said the money for adult social care “will only just meet what most in the sector said would be the bare minimum in 2020/21 to keep to system going”.

“It’s enough to meet demographic demand pressures, but it’s not going to be enough to increase quality, meet unmet needs, or give much stability to providers and the hugely under-valued social care workforce,” she added.

Cllr David Williams, chairman-elect of the County Councils Network and leader of Hertfordshire County Council, welcomed the news as “hugely significant and very welcome”, however, VODG chief executive, Dr Rhidian Hughes, said the funding was “no more than a small step forward”.

Harry Quilter-Pinner, IPPR Senior Research Fellow, labelled the Chancellor’s announcement as “lots of bluster and no real action”.

“Only a bold commitment to free personal care in order to ensure everyone gets the care they need without having to sell their homes will finally resolve the care crisis,” he said.

Tags : FundingLegislation
mm

The author Lee Peart

1 Comment

  1. While the £1..5 billion is welcome, it is but a mere drop in the ocean as it will take at least £8 billion to bring the funding levels back to that of 2009/2010 and therefore will do nothing to improve quality care.

    Meantime the most vulnerable within the UK will be left to suffer and also their families, which in turn will and is creating a further burden on Health.

    The article states ‘Professor Martin Green OBE, chief executive of Care England, said: “If the Chancellor had neglected social care in his Comprehensive Spending Review it would have morphed into an incomprehensive spending review as it is essential to set the books straight for social care.

    This money is extremely welcome, but it must reach the front line.’

    Yes the money does need to reach the fron line, but what is the frontline, is it the frontline within Local Authorities Social Care departments or is it to the frontline care workers delivering the care to the most vulnerable.

    Also the criteria for the most vulnerable, as over the years been tightened, so making some of the most vulnerable are no longer so, as the money available will not streach that far and many care delivery visits have been shortened to such an extent that virtually no real care can be given within the alloted time.

    Quality care is a casuality within all this and thereby the needs of the most vulnerable are not being met. to receive good quality care is now becoming the exception and not the expected.

    In fact, many authorities when conducting the required Needs Assemessments are not noting the full.
    needs required, but only the needs required which can be funded. So, in reality the full cost of prviding care is now not even known.

    All this coupled with the inability of the DWP to do full correct Benefit Assessments is meaning the vulnerable are becoming even more vulnerable second by second.

    Does Anyone Really Care?

Leave a Response