CORDER’S COLUMN: Old Labour New Danger

Labour’s Shadow Home Secretary wants to kick the private sector out of running care homes.

The Labour party’s Shadow Health Secretary, Andy Burnham, is hoping to turn the clock back in Greater Manchester to the days when care homes were run by the State.

The former Secretary of State for Health has correctly diagnosed the crisis of bed blocking in NHS hospitals, and rightly aims for an outcome where hospitals, care homes and domiciliary care services work seamlessly together.

Story continues below
Advertisement

While Mr Burnham is right about the diagnosis and the desired outcome, he is entirely wrong about the treatment required to cure the problem. Stripping the private sector of its role in providing taxpayer-funded social care would cost more and lead to worse services.

Mr Bunham’s plan, which is likely to be a headline grabbing manifesto pledge in his Greater Manchester mayoral election pitch, could very well be put into action. He is a popular politician in the north west, not least for his admirable campaigning on behalf of Hillsborough victims. Add in his national profile as Shadow Foreign Secretary, and you can see why he is currently 5/4-on with the bookies to win the contest (although interim Mayor Tony Lloyd is currently favourite to win).

Greater Manchester is the only English region that has control over health and social care spending, a devolved power that George Osborne may regret granting almost as much as owners of the private sector care companies that could be affected by Mr Burnham’s experiment.

Ironically, his pitch comes in a month where an exemplary £60 million public/private partnership has been completed in Suffolk, with 10 homes built by Care UK now open and operating.

Around half the beds are contracted to the County Council for 25 years for taxpayer-funded residents who will receive high quality residential care in brand new buildings.

Plus they will have access to nursing care, which the council was not able to provide in the 16 ageing care homes that it used to run before the private sector Care UK stepped in.

Revenue from the 50% of beds that Care UK retains for private-funders is making this improvement in care for council-funded relatives possible.

Mr Burnham should pay close attention to how this highly desirable outcome was achieved.

Authors

4 Comments

  1. Bob Ferguson said:

    Accuracy checks. First, Andy Burnham is not shadow Foreign Secretary. He is shadow Home Secretary. Second, Suffolk County Council cannot “provide” nursing care in its care homes – only one council has managed to do that so far: Hampshire County Council. Suggest you read up the history of how that was achieved in the early years of the century.

    • Rob Corder said:

      Thank you for your comments. Well-spotted that Andy Burnham is shadow Home Secretary. I have corrected this. I am less clear about your assertion that Suffolk County Council cannot provide nursing care in its homes. My understanding is that without the private investment by Care UK, and the fees it accrues offering half its beds to private-pay residents, there would not be nursing care available to locally authority-funded residents in the county within Care UK homes.

  2. William Charlton said:

    Is this the Care UK Community Partnerships Ltd mentioned on http://www.cqc.org.uk/provider/1-116865825 that out of 98 homes; 23 were as yet unchecked, 36 Require improvement, 1 was Inadequate and 38 were Good? Giving roughly a 50/50 split between good and bad, compared to the national average, last time I checked, of around 30 bad to 70 good. Or are are you referring to some other exemplary care home provider?

    • Rob Corder said:

      I was referring to the CQC ratings for the past 12 months to May 2016.

*

Related posts

Top