close

Care leaders voice disappointment at LGA, ADASS COVID-19 funding proposals

Consumers Feel The Pinch With Christmas Around The Corner

Care leaders have voiced their disappointment at proposals from the LGA and ADASS to cover additional costs caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

In a joint statement, the LGA and ADASS suggested that costs for social care providers were likely to increase in the region of 10% in April and that local authorities would need to consider how best to make additional payments, which could include directly meeting additional costs, uplifts to fees, or through support in kind.

The statement also aims to address concerns about sustainability and price, particularly around cost pressures such as higher dependency levels, higher staff sickness absence rates, higher administration costs due to greater volatility of support packages and personal protective equipment costs.

Story continues below
Advertisement

It follows the government announcement on March 19 that it would give £1.6bn emergency funding to local authorities to help cover additional pressures created by the coronavirus crisis.

Professor Martin Green OBE, Chief Executive of Care England, said: “A 10% increase is simply insufficient, no ifs or buts. If local government cannot reconcile funding for adult social care and thus does not have the money to fund care home beds for existing and new residents then we have a serious problem on our hands.  It is false economy to underfund the adult social care sector and will also severely impact hospital services.”

Dr Rhidian Hughes, chief executive of VODG, added: “While we recognise that local authorities have been left with a meagre budget, the suggestion that costs for social care providers will rise by in the region of 10% is inaccurate and does not reflect the current and continually rising costs of provision. Furthermore, the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on social care providers and associated staffing pressures will continue long into the future.

“The statement is also concerning because it lacks clear direction and a mandate, without which there is the risk that local authorities may simply choose to ignore the guidance. Funding for learning disability and autism and other disability services also needs to be clarified without delay.

“Now more than ever we need strong local leadership to work hand in hand with the voluntary sector to ensure people in some of the most vulnerable circumstances are best supported at this time of great need.”

Tags : Funding
mm

The author Lee Peart

1 Comment

  1. The priority for the majority of Care Providers at this moment is to care for the health and welfare of existing staff and residents and ,if necessary, not expose those individuals to any greater risk than at present. We have a duty to those people already in our care to protect them and not expose them to additional risk.
    Whilst all care homes are experiencing considerably increased costs and particularly ever more exorbitant Agency costs this is not an appropriate time to discuss fees other than short term arrangements to cover the current exceptional situation.
    On a general note the present circumstances serve only too well to demonstrate the good work done by the majority of Care homes for Local Authorities and the NHS at fee levels that ,on average ,equate to hourly rates ranging from £3.50 to £4.75 .Once again ,sadly, it takes a crisis to show how our homes and dedicated staff are undervalued by our paymasters

Leave a Response